Module Lwt.Infix
This module provides several infix operators for making programming with Lwt more convenient.
To use it, open Lwt.Infix.
Of the operators declared in this module, only >|= is recommended for new code. The only other commonly-used operator is >>=.
val (>>=) : 'a t -> ('a -> 'b t) -> 'b tp >>= fis the same asLwt.bindp f. It requiresLwt.Infixto be opened in scope:open Lwt.Infix let () = Lwt_main.run (Lwt_io.(read_line stdin) >>= Lwt_io.printl) (* ocamlfind opt -linkpkg -thread -package lwt.unix code.ml && ./a.out *)It is recommended to use the PPX
let%lwtsyntax instead. This operator is the next-best choice. It is frequently found while reading existing Lwt code.
val (>|=) : 'a t -> ('a -> 'b) -> 'b tp >|= fis the same asLwt.mapf p. It requiresLwt.Infixto be opened in scope.open Lwt.Infix let () = Lwt_main.run (Lwt_io.(read_line stdin) >|= ignore) (* ocamlfind opt -linkpkg -thread -package lwt.unix code.ml && ./a.out *)
val (<&>) : unit t -> unit t -> unit tp1 <&> p2is the same asLwt.join[p1; p2]. It requiresLwt.Infixto be opened in scope.Unlike with
Lwt.bindandLwt.map, there are no problems with explicitLwt.joinsyntax, so using this operator is not recommended.
val (<?>) : 'a t -> 'a t -> 'a tp1 <?> p2is the same asLwt.choose[p1; p2]. It requiresLwt.Infixto be opened in scope.Unlike with
Lwt.bindandLwt.join, there are no problems with explicitLwt.choosesyntax, so using this operator is not recommended.Furthermore, most users actually need
Lwt.pickinstead ofLwt.choose.
val (=<<) : ('a -> 'b t) -> 'a t -> 'b tf =<< pis the same asLwt.bindp f. It requiresLwt.Infixto be opened in scope.This operator is obscure and its use is discouraged. It is the same as
p >>= f.
val (=|<) : ('a -> 'b) -> 'a t -> 'b tf =|< pis the same asLwt.mapf p. It requiresLwt.Infixto be opened in scope.This operator is obscure and its use is discouraged. It is the same as
p >|= f.
module Let_syntax : sig ... endThis module provides support for ppx_let.